Bad News... |
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 8> |
Author | |
eastcoastgirl
New Member Joined: 26 Apr 2010 Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
No I do not know you, I was merely trying to point out that this is not the place to solicit business. I will not respond to any further posts on this matter. I don't judge you or anyone else, I am in no place to judge. Just stating the obvious.
|
|
06/22/09:Married in Santo Domingo
04/22/10:Application received in Mississauga. 06/01/10:Approved to sponsor 07/16/10:In process (can finally log on e-cas on 21st) 07/30/10:AOR rec'd in mail |
|
immigrationconsultan
New Member Joined: 02 Jul 2010 Location: Richmond Status: Offline Points: 40 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I am giving free advice yes but if you look at this post they where looking for someone to do there file and assist them with there appeal this means going to the appeal court and yes i would charge for this you don't know me at all so don't judge me and why would i take advantage of people i believe what comes around goes around Karma and by the way someone did contact me and ask me to help this person but i was not able to reach them .....Stop judging where all here for the same reason
|
|
eastcoastgirl
New Member Joined: 26 Apr 2010 Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
@Immigrationconsultant...you say you are legit and want to offer free advise, but why in the other post did you say you would charge her a reasonable fee (not your words exactly but this is basically what you said). People on this forum are here to offer and recieve adivse and support free of cost. When someone is going through a rough time, I do not think they need people coming out of the woodwork charging them money. If she requested your help, that would be a totally different scenario. If someone had given her the number or name of someone to contact, that would have also been a different scenario. You on the other hand are looking for money in my opinion and could care less how she makes out. Again, this is only my opinion. I just know there are many people out there that are indeed naive, good honest people that are easily taken advantage of. I would hate to think this is what is going on.
|
|
06/22/09:Married in Santo Domingo
04/22/10:Application received in Mississauga. 06/01/10:Approved to sponsor 07/16/10:In process (can finally log on e-cas on 21st) 07/30/10:AOR rec'd in mail |
|
immigrationconsultan
New Member Joined: 02 Jul 2010 Location: Richmond Status: Offline Points: 40 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
East coast girl i am legit and you can verify my membership as a csic member i am not prying on innocent people as you notice this person ask for help and i offer my help
I understand that you may feel i am scam as there is many scam here is the link where u can verify my id https://www.csic-scci.ca/find/all.html my name is Nancy Le Breton and to lonely why is it not the right spot for consultant to be here i am also in process of sponsorship my husband and i think that if i can give free advice and help people and also learn and listen to what people need and want If i offended anyone it was not my intention i am sorry my intention are good i am just trying to help east coast girl i am also original from the east coast i am a from New Brunswick but now live in B.C. Wish you all luck and a good day |
|
lonely
Junior Member Joined: 05 Jun 2010 Status: Offline Points: 137 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have to agree with eastcoastgirl. these forums are for those who are going through the process and we are here for each other to help if we can. I feel it is not the right spot for consultants to be.
|
|
eastcoastgirl
New Member Joined: 26 Apr 2010 Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
@Immigrationconsultant....
It would be my guess that this is NOT a place to solicit business for yourself and prey on innocent people and take advantage of their misfortunes!!!!! Get a life and go look for business elsewhere!!!!
(If I am wrong and this person is legit, I do apologize but something tells me this is a scam)!
|
|
06/22/09:Married in Santo Domingo
04/22/10:Application received in Mississauga. 06/01/10:Approved to sponsor 07/16/10:In process (can finally log on e-cas on 21st) 07/30/10:AOR rec'd in mail |
|
immigrationconsultan
New Member Joined: 02 Jul 2010 Location: Richmond Status: Offline Points: 40 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hello
I want to first tell you that i am sorry about the outcome of your file I am a immigration consultant and would like to talk to you about it and help you with you appeal at a reasonable cost Contact me anytime Nancy [email protected] |
|
boundary47
Senior Member Joined: 01 Dec 2009 Status: Offline Points: 317 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have no doubt that most IOs take their jobs quite seriously, and I am sure there are some difficult cases to decide. I recall reading that the rejection rates vary considerably by office, and I assume this is due to a combination of a higher proportion of weak or even outright fraudulent applications, and more skeptical IOs. Some would undoubtedly interpret regional differences as evidence of racial or cultural bias, and I've no doubt that it's a fair charge in some cases. After all, the world is far from perfect, and if there's anything I've learned it's that almost anything you can imagine has happened at one time or another.
I'm sure there are genuine couples who have been kept apart by rejections; fraudulent applications correctly sniffed out and rejected, and even cases in which sponsors have been saved from a lot of grief by IO's rejections of people trying to use a sponsor's affection to gain entry to Canada. The entire gamut is undoubtedly represented among those rejected. However, that is no comfort to a genuine couple who haven't provided the level of proof required by their IO. The system is imperfect and undoubtedly mistakes are made. It's cold comfort to the victims of these mistakes that the system generally works quite well and processes the majority of applications fairly, albeit very slowly in some offices. My heart goes out to those rejected - I can imagine how that must feel, as I think most of us can because undoubtedly we worried about it while our application was in play.
|
|
B47
Jan 29 App. sent Mar 1 Sponsor approved Mar 9 Passport requested Mar 24 RPR Fee paid Apr 15 File under review Apr 30 Decision made May 11 Decision mailed May 13 Visa received May 20 Landed |
|
dpenabill
Top Member Joined: 29 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 6407 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I largely agree with PMM.
However, there does appear to be an unwritten or unofficial tendency toward, if not a relatively defined threshold imposed upon, certain kinds of applications being processed in a few specific Visa Offices. And this is probably based very much on practical realities and probabilities, not cultural or ethnic bias (even though perhaps the impact has a disproportionate impact on certain cultural and ethnic groups, and of course it appears that too often some cultural and ethnic bias does encroach into the process). As a result, especially relative to applications to sponsor persons from particular third-world, economically disadvantaged countries, and involving applicants (from such countries) with whom the sponsor has not had a lot of physical contact, the applicant probably faces a more difficult burden of proof . . . again, probably based on empirical data . . . which of course is probably exacerbated by the simple reality that the absence of a lot of personal, physical contact itself attenuates the capacity of the sponsor and applicant to fully and intimately know each other (many are "fooled" or misled by someone they spend large portions of most days with, let alone by someone who they rarely have spent physical time with), making it more difficult to "prove" the genuineness of the relationship. It is worth remembering, it is not a Visa Officer's job to abstractly discern whether or not a relationship is genuine. It is the Visa Officer's job to determine whether or not the applicant has PROVEN that that relationship is genuine as well as all the other elements of the application. Thus, just because a relationship is indeed genuine does not mean it qualifies. It must be genuine, AND the applicant must PROVE it is genuine. This seems to be oft overlooked; it appears many tend to present what might be called a "prima facie" case thinking that is sufficient (and I had an acquaintance who obviously approached the sponsorship of his Russian wife this way, with predictable results). It isn't. Edited by dpenabill - 02 Jul 2010 at 4:39pm |
|
Bureaucracy is what bureaucracy does, or When in doubt, follow the instructions. Otherwise, follow the instructions.
BTW: Not an expert, not a Can. lawyer, never worked in immigration |
|
pmm
Top Member Joined: 29 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 2279 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi
1. I doubt that there are any "secret instructions" there are just too many applications, so the IO has no real interest or hidden agenda. They just want them processed and off their desk, so they can get on with the next one. 2. I bet most IOs would prefer that all the applications were complete and genuine, it is a lot less work to approve than refuse, and document and write the refusal. |
|
PMM
|
|
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 8> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |