CHC DELHI 2004 APPLICANTS

Edited by gspreet - 23 Jun 2011 at 12:33am

Dear Kaushik,


Tim: - I read your preceding email. Did you send it to the Minister? If so, have you gotten any reply? I'd like to know what it was if any. (Incidentally, I think that you expressed yourself and the issue very well.)


I'll try to address your questions within the text of your email.

Can you please tell me what exactly is planning of Govt. of Canada to clear this backlog.

Honestly, I don't think that CIC has any plan. That's why I want to litigate the issue: It will force action.

They are really interested to clear backlog.

Tim: -No.

What exactly is the analysis of CHC New Delhi regarding old applicant process

Tim: -I don't know but, from the pro forma email response you sent, it would appear to be: They can wait it out or ask for a refund. The program manager is very bright, exceedingly arrogant and has held high-level positions at CIC. Thus, he's certainly capable of grasping the realty but devoid of any concern about its impact on applicants. In fact, some years back -- when there was one queue only and it stretched back five years -- he said that he didn't care if people gave up 'cause there's an endless supply of eager applicants. As as said, "arrogant".


Why New Delhi timeline is increasing from 72 month to 80 month & now from 80 month to 90 month and its totally infinite time left to consider our case.Mention the misleading information on the website about the processing time as it gives an impression that the future processing time would be more or less the same.

Tim: -Well, I suspect that, if you check the time-frame for the old cases, you find that each month it increased by a month. That's because they're not assessing any of those files. I give New Delhi credit, however, for revealing that it has a two-year supply of new applicants, making it very clear that, unless people sue CIC, the old files will in New Delhi will never be seen so long as the current processing priority is maintained



Why does the New Delhi and the Canadian site differ in the processing times?


Tim: -You'd need to be more specific. Keep in mind, however, that the CIC website refers to files which have been finalised. I haven't check Delhi's website but I would suspect that its projecting how much longer applicants will have to wait.



Why are new priority processing rules allowed to come and go without processing the long waiting applications.   

Tim: -It's an approach all too many people take. If they freeze files pre-existing their arrival, focusing only on those which came after they did, they can look efficient, saying: "See, I finalized files in under one year whereas those who came before me averaged three years per file." It makes the boss/worker look efficient.

What is the meaning of giving such updates for final evaluation if CHC New Delhi is not ready to process such cases.

Tim: -You'd have to ask them. I have an idea but it's only a guess. I mean, why doesn't a child run to mommy and say: "I broke the mirror" when he knows that she'll realize it once she looks for it? Answer: many she won't go looking.





Please help or give some hint about processing been done at new delhi.

Tim: -Kaushik, I can't do anything alone. It's going to require people willing to stand up for their rights, willing to hire a lawyer to represent them and a lawyer willing to pursue their cause for them. If enough people are willing to do so, we can proceed. If at least 50 applicants sign on, I will file two court cases per applicants. The first, which requires the Court's permission to be heard, will seek an order requiring the CHC to assess the file within a specified time-frame; the second will seek damages equal to the wages you would have earned had your visa been issued when it should have been issued.


Because permission is not required to seek damages, within a month of filing, CIC will respond with a motion asking the Court to dismiss the case. If the Court refuses -- as it should -- CIC will likely offer to settle, especially if we have hundreds of cases because the liability would be too much. The settlement would be a promise to assess the files within a specific time-frame in exchange for forgoing damages.


If at least 100 applicants are willing to proceed, I will charge either $550 (the filing fees are $52) plus $1,000 if successful or $750/$750. The fee would be less for consultants who bring forward a number of cases and assist in putting together the clients' affidavits.


Regards,


Tim
Can you please tell me what exactly is planning of Govt. of Canada to clear this backlog.

ONLY FIVE DAYS LEFT FOR THIS SITE TO BE CONTINUED. LET US SEE WHETHER IT CONTINUES OR DISCONTINUED.

                  No Comments!!

NARANG wrote: one of mine known applicant of march 04and whom elder bro. is in canada put inquiry to CHC by a canadian MP THE CHC in its reply to MP said case pending due to pending policy matter this is how CHC is working these days

HI CHANDIGARH-TORONTO