ATIP REQUESTS - Instructions and Insights |
Post Reply | Page <1234 6> |
Author | ||
obryan20
Top Member Joined: 19 Sep 2014 Location: Toronto Status: Offline Points: 913 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Ok, thanks for your response.
|
||
FSW1 NOC 1111
App: 21-May-14 Visa: 29-Oct-14 PR: 7-Jan-15 <a href="https://secure.immigration.ca/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10955&title=jamaican-cases-questions-answers-advice" rel="nofollow">FAQ</a> |
||
ski
Moderator Group Forum Moderator Joined: 14 Aug 2012 Status: Offline Points: 564 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes that should be sufficient.
|
||
obryan20
Top Member Joined: 19 Sep 2014 Location: Toronto Status: Offline Points: 913 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi all
An ATIP request to CIC (GCMS notes) requires proof that one is a Canadian citizen or permanent resident. For the latter, can the "Confirmation of Permanent Residence" (IMM 5688) document duly signed and dated upon completing the landing procedure be used as proof in lieu of a Permanent Residence Card?
Edited by obryan20 - 20 Jan 2015 at 2:21pm |
||
FSW1 NOC 1111
App: 21-May-14 Visa: 29-Oct-14 PR: 7-Jan-15 <a href="https://secure.immigration.ca/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10955&title=jamaican-cases-questions-answers-advice" rel="nofollow">FAQ</a> |
||
dpenabill
Top Member Joined: 29 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 6407 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Request for help composing and making a customized request for copy of the FPAT: A recent report indicates, for a particular applicant (not me obviously, since I have been a citizen for approaching a year already), that the FPAT has been completed. The FPAT is the long-form CJ referral for a residency case. The template or what it contains is not publicly available. However, since it is the referral, since it will go to the CJ (this is in reference to a case which appears to be headed for a CJ residency hearing) and an applicant should be entitled to a copy of everything the CJ considers, the applicant should be able to obtain a copy of this . . . and anything and everything else to be sent to the CJ for the CJ to consider. The question is how to do a customized Access to Information request which gets past CIC's generic response, which so far as I have yet to see is merely a GCMS query-based report plus, if requested, physical files. While I suspect that CIC will resist providing a copy of the completed FPAT, this is such important information it is almost certainly worth challenging. But a properly made customized request is the necessary first step. So if anyone has any experience in doing this, or otherwise has insight into how to go about this, I know of at least one individual who would be grateful for the information. Note: in the past this did not seem feasible, because it appeared there was a narrow window of time between when the referral was completed and the CJ hearing was scheduled, not enough time to make the request and get the information even if one knew when the referral was completed, let alone enough time to challenge CIC if it declined to disclose this information (which I suspect it will). In the case I am somewhat familiar with, however, a generic ATIP request response indicates that the FPAT is completed. Still no hearing has been scheduled. This seems to be a prime opportunity to make the formal written request for a copy of the specific referral in this individual's case. Of course if this individual then shares, in this or another forum, some information about the FPAT in general that would be invaluable information for many, many others who have a high risk of going to a CJ residency hearing. |
||
Bureaucracy is what bureaucracy does, or When in doubt, follow the instructions. Otherwise, follow the instructions.
BTW: Not an expert, not a Can. lawyer, never worked in immigration |
||
greeen
Average Member Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Status: Offline Points: 159 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi sagafemina,
I know that each case is different but just to speculate here. For your case and from looking at the dates how long it took from CIC start working on your CIT0065 till the approval. I believe from your electronic file you can tell the date. If you don't feel OK to reveal this info then I understand. Thanks |
||
greeen
Average Member Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Status: Offline Points: 159 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thanks sagafemina. Don't worry we all became experts on this. Thank you for your input and this what I thought.
|
||
sagafemina
Junior Member Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 115 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm no expert on these things, just reported based on my experience. I would have been very concerned about anying suggesting Miss(inG) records!
BUt I would think that having the form CIT0065etc form does mean that someone is working on your files, as this is where they will list the final approval. So probably it DOES mean that your RQ is in process! |
||
App rec'd 29 Dec 2010
Prcs 21 Nov 2011 Vic->BCIS 1 Feb 2012 Doc id, RQ issued 24 Apr 2013 60 hr, 158p, $70 RQ 23 Jun 13 ATIP 6/30: Cit grant 4 Jul 14 eCas 1st update 9/23 since Mar 13 Oath 10/14/14 |
||
greeen
Average Member Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Status: Offline Points: 159 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi sagafemina- Sorry it's the way around. Last month ATIP did not had the form CIT0065B022008 and the Batch Name field: Miss_Records BUT this month ATIP has them. Does that indicate that my 2012 RQ is being reviewed or any thing??? Thank you for the input.
|
||
greeen
Average Member Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Status: Offline Points: 159 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi sagafemina, I would appreciate your comments on this: My last month ATIP indicated form CIT0065B022008 and the Batch Name field: Miss_Records. This month ATIP report does not has both CIT0065B02200 Miss_Records and the Batch Name field is blank. What do you think???? Thanks |
||
sagafemina
Junior Member Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 115 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
How long ago did you return your RQ? Is there a notation anywhere that the RQ has been matched to the file? If not, then either they did not receive the RQ or it has not yet been incorporated into your file. This process can take months. Did you send your RQ by a traceable route or with signature required? If not, surely hope you kept a copy. Some people have been asked to reproduce the whole packet when presumably the original was misplaced. There may be lines or whole pages redacted which might explain why no notes. They don't typically make notations on your application itself. Is there a form CIT0065? You are a fairly new member. It may be just too early for anything to register on your file as yet. Don't despair. Try again in 6 months... |
||
App rec'd 29 Dec 2010
Prcs 21 Nov 2011 Vic->BCIS 1 Feb 2012 Doc id, RQ issued 24 Apr 2013 60 hr, 158p, $70 RQ 23 Jun 13 ATIP 6/30: Cit grant 4 Jul 14 eCas 1st update 9/23 since Mar 13 Oath 10/14/14 |
||
Post Reply | Page <1234 6> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |