Canada Immigration and Visa Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Canada Immigration Topics > Canadian Citizenship
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - CPC-S and Local Office RQ stats: 22.1%  *UPDATED*
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

CPC-S and Local Office RQ stats: 22.1% *UPDATED*

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Message
akella View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 30 May 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 714
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote akella Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: CPC-S and Local Office RQ stats: 22.1% *UPDATED*
    Posted: 30 May 2013 at 6:37pm

The following is another document obtained via Access to Information Request.

*** UPDATED on 6/3 w CBSA DATA ***

  • Weekly RQ data covering 2012/05/06 to 2013/04/27
  • More detailed data is available in original document and converted dataset linked below.
  • Total RQs: 22.1% (almost 2x higher than Minister's claim of 12% here)
  • CPC-S sent only 150k files to local offices during this period

RQ Total (both CPC-S and Local Office RQs)



 
Period: 2012/05/06 - 2013/04/27
 
 
 
 
 
 
#
%
Applications Referred to Local Office
150,236
 
RQ Issued by CPC-S
27,584
18.4%
RQ Issued by Local Office
5,552
3.7%*
Total RQs
33,136
22.1%
 
* "Applications Referred to Local Office" was used as a base to calculate this percentage.


RQ Issued by CPC-S and File Referred by CPC-S



 
Total
 
RQ Issued by CPC-S
27,584
Applications Referred to Local Office
150,236
RQ Issuance Rate
18.4%
 
 
RQs Issued by Local Office
 
 
 
 
Total
 
BC Itinerant Services
201
Calgary CIC
39
Edmonton CIC
175
Etobicoke CIC
3
Fredericton CIC
4
Hamilton CIC
289
Kitchener CIC
286
Mississauga CIC
1,277
Moncton CIC
245
Montreal Citizenship
7
Niagara Falls CIC
119
Ottawa CIC
223
Query Response Centre
6
Scarborough Citizenship Operations
317
Scarborough Immigration Operations
7
St. Clair CIC
933
St. John's CIC
8
Surrey CIC
102
Toronto Reviews & Interventions CIC
90
Vancouver Citizenship
810
Windsor CIC
201
Winnipeg CIC
210
Total
5,552
 
Original document:

http://rapidshare.com/files/3357580010/RQ_Stats_Apr2013.pdf

Dataset in Excel form (converted from pdf - please, refer to the original if in doubt):

http://rapidshare.com/files/2743762279/RQ_Stats_Apr2013.xlsx


*** JUNE 3 UPDATE ***

Just got my hands on another ATI document - this time coming from CBSA.

The following is the number of requests for ICES Traveler History reports (that one would expect to correlate closely with the number of RQs issued by CIC)

Month / Calendar year
2011
2012
2013
January
258
507
833
February
262
533
900
March
330
620
953
April
302
591
1192
May
263
202

June
291
1100
 
July
307
1612
 
August
362
1614
 
September
356
1603
 
October
363
1159
 
November
386
900
 
December
288
673
 
 
3768
11114
3878
 

Indeed there seems to be a policy change in October/November. However, the "new normal" is still 2x-3x times higher than it was before.


Original:

http://rapidshare.com/files/1277112238/CBSA_Number_of_ICES_Requests.pdf









Edited by akella - 03 Jun 2013 at 11:17pm
Back to Top
alaink View Drop Down
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 09 Dec 2012
Location: montreal
Status: Offline
Points: 106
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote alaink Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2013 at 7:06pm
So pretty much if you count RQs given by local offices assuming those are another  5% of the applicants almost 1 in 4 applicants is considered non-routine and thrown into the 35 months bin! Ouch
Back to Top
vefabuyuk View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 333
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote vefabuyuk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2013 at 7:16pm
This is like building skyscrapers without having the necessary infrastructure. We need good policy makers. Operation Bulletins should not be written impulsively based on few fraudsters.
From the Phillipines. In Canada since 2003. Architect. Landed in 2008 March.
Back to Top
EasyRider View Drop Down
Top Member
Top Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Location: Montreal
Status: Offline
Points: 1512
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EasyRider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2013 at 7:17pm
You're a wizard, man! This table is awesome.

I briefly took a look as on the go now-- seems there was adjustment in policy end of November 2012 as RQ rate dropped from 30%+.

Kenney probably conveniently used a limited period to draw a number, like one month. So much for the value of what's being said.

150k applications a year throughout is still too slow even to stop backlog/timelines from growing (~240k+ applying a year), I'm not even talking about shrinking timeline. I always want to ask proponents of soon 10-14 timelines for the majority, by which means exactly they see it happening?

So, expect another timelines/backlog growth in the next stats updates.
Back to Top
Glimmer View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 305
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Glimmer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2013 at 7:25pm
I don't know how you do it, Akella! Thank you.  Fascinating.
Back to Top
kisunja85 View Drop Down
Average Member
Average Member


Joined: 20 Oct 2012
Location: Edmonton, AB
Status: Offline
Points: 156
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kisunja85 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2013 at 7:34pm
Akella, YOU ROCK!Clap Thanks so much! Yes, it seems that the rate of issuing RQs by Sydney decreased, while the processing speed at Sydney, based on the number of applications processed, peaked up compared to summer 2012.  But who and when on Earth will process all those kilos of docs at the local offices?!

Edited by kisunja85 - 30 May 2013 at 7:36pm
Back to Top
EasyRider View Drop Down
Top Member
Top Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Location: Montreal
Status: Offline
Points: 1512
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EasyRider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2013 at 7:48pm
Interesting that Mississauga issued 1277 RQ's for the whole period while Montreal just 7.
Back to Top
akella View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 30 May 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 714
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote akella Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2013 at 7:54pm
I stand corrected: those are two separate tables.
18.4% refers to CPC-S RQs. Bottom table is to be added to this number (Local Office RQs). So the final number is higher. I'll update the top post in a bit.
Back to Top
eileen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 388
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eileen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2013 at 8:27pm
#1- Akella, un grand merci à toi! C'est incroyable!
#2- I find it the timing of Kenney's interview with SA Generation Next and his tweets regarding RQs to be suspect. In the interview and tweets he "released" data on RQs and the citizenship delay, a subject that he has said next to nothing about previously.

Let's review the info he released:
*"Our goal is 12 month service standard" for citizenship application processing. Twitter 22/05/2013.
*"Current time is 23 months" Twitter 22/05/2013 and SA Generation Next 22/05/2013
*"12 per cent citizenship applicants are being given a residence questionnaire" SA Generation Next 22/05/2013

This was mere hours before the processing timeline was revised to 25 months. Days before the release showing ACTUAL RQ numbers for the first time. And there is still no official service standard for citizenship processing.

He also assured us that the RQ is not targeting any communities specifically. But considering how his other assertions have panned out, I'm not sure I would accept that as the whole truth.

He is controlling the message and directing the conversation so people talk about the 12 month processing "goal", rather than the 25 month (or longer) processing reality.

Thank you Akella for lending actual facts to this conversation, unlike MP Kenney.


Edited by eileen - 30 May 2013 at 8:27pm
Resources for Future Canadians & their Advocates: http://residencequestionnaire.wordpress.com
Back to Top
akella View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 30 May 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 714
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote akella Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2013 at 8:36pm
Originally posted by eileen eileen wrote:


*"12 per cent citizenship applicants are being given a residence questionnaire" SA Generation Next 22/05/2013

I am very disappointed by this number, it differs significantly from the real number of RQs. And I think this is a good point to bring up in tweets & letters - any accountant would be fired on the spot for misstating the numbers by 100%!

Someone please look at the data - any ideas on what period might have been used for this statement?

Also - mind you - they compile these numbers by searching for notes (see email in the beginning of the document) in GCMS. So if the note is misspelled (and I see a lot of spelling errors in my GCMS), it won't show up = there may be RQs unaccounted for in this report, and the final number should be even higher.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down