Is it for all now or we got a fast one!? Montreal |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
EasyRider
Top Member Joined: 02 Mar 2010 Location: Montreal Status: Offline Points: 1512 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Which cases? |
|
michels
Junior Member Joined: 11 Mar 2013 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
---
Michel- PR: Applied SW Apr2001/Visa Aug2006/Landed Oct2006 Citizenship: Sent Nov2013,in Process Feb2014, LoT Aug2014, Test and Oath Nov2014 End of line :) Happy citizen ever since |
|
michels
Junior Member Joined: 11 Mar 2013 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Mainly the relevant one is against Koussa
|
|
---
Michel- PR: Applied SW Apr2001/Visa Aug2006/Landed Oct2006 Citizenship: Sent Nov2013,in Process Feb2014, LoT Aug2014, Test and Oath Nov2014 End of line :) Happy citizen ever since |
|
dpenabill
Top Member Joined: 29 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 6407 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
In both the Al-Showaiter case and in the Dina El-Koussa case, Justice Near granted the Minister's appeal because the Citizenship Judge failed to state adequate reasons for the decision to approve the applicants. Neither case stood for the proposition that leaving Canada after applying was grounds to deny citizenship. When you first referred to two cases illustrating the denial of citizenship to applicants who left Canada after applying, I thought you were referring to decisions by Justice Harrington, one in the Bousserghini & Kranfouli case, and the other the Mohamed Richi case, both being cases in which the applicants appear to have met the residency requirement but were denied citizenship due to absences (or alleged absences) after applying. I intend to address the latter two cases more in the RQ discussions topic. |
|
Bureaucracy is what bureaucracy does, or When in doubt, follow the instructions. Otherwise, follow the instructions.
BTW: Not an expert, not a Can. lawyer, never worked in immigration |
|
123smike
Junior Member Joined: 21 Feb 2013 Status: Offline Points: 147 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I thought the minister would follow the court orders and cannot overrule its judgement???
|
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |