![]() |
BLUNDER!! |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
TD123 ![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Jul 2012 Location: Toronto Status: Offline Points: 100 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 22 May 2014 at 1:30am |
Today I received a copy of case progress report (DVD) via ATIP.... 500+ pages that included each and every document I had submitted since I had applied for citizenship.
I, however, noticed a HUGE blunder that I had made when I filled up the initial application: I entered the landing date incorrectly --- instead of March (03), I typed April (04) ![]() ![]() ![]() On the other hand, while calculating the total number of physically present days using the online residence calculator, I used the correct landing date. Kindly advice what should I do now? Thanks, TD123 Edited by TD123 - 22 May 2014 at 1:44am |
|
St. Clair
Applied: Aug 2011 Started: March 2012 Test/Interview/RQ: July 2012 RQ submitted: Aug/Sep 2012 File xfered to Scarborough for Oath: 11 Aug 2014 Oath: 25 Nov 2014 |
|
![]() |
|
greeen ![]() Average Member ![]() Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Status: Offline Points: 159 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi TD123,
Did you request your ATIP as physical file or electronic file? My ATIP just show the system notes but not the actual documents I sent. Please let me know how you requested this type of report. Regards, |
|
![]() |
|
greeen ![]() Average Member ![]() Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Status: Offline Points: 159 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If the mistake you've done does not take you under the 1095 day you should be fine. The problem comes from two errors. First if the net APP days are less than 1095 and second if the typo error resulted in an absence that is not documented properly.Please give me some insight how to get such a report because mine is only a print out of the system not a CD that contains copy of actual file.
|
|
![]() |
|
daktrader ![]() Junior Member ![]() Joined: 01 Apr 2014 Status: Offline Points: 135 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The actual copy of your case file is 'Physical File'
Request for the data to be sent on a CD via mail. Good Luck!
|
|
Landed: August, 2005
Applied: Feb 2010 Test: Jan 2011 RQ Received: Feb 2011 RQ Submitted: March 2011 Total Waiting Time: 52 months Office: St-Claire |
|
![]() |
|
greeen ![]() Average Member ![]() Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Status: Offline Points: 159 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you. By the way I've spoke with MP office a week ago. They fully understand the situation and their response is similar to the call center. No help in this respect.
|
|
![]() |
|
daktrader ![]() Junior Member ![]() Joined: 01 Apr 2014 Status: Offline Points: 135 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
MPs dont have the influence they used to have years ago...
The applicant is better off ordering the ATIP report and finding out the stage the application is stuck at... ATIP reports send a sense of nudge to the CIC Office; if there has been no activity on the file earlier...The ATIP forces the CO to brush the dust off the file and open it...'some movement is better than no movement' Good Luck!
|
|
Landed: August, 2005
Applied: Feb 2010 Test: Jan 2011 RQ Received: Feb 2011 RQ Submitted: March 2011 Total Waiting Time: 52 months Office: St-Claire |
|
![]() |
|
TD123 ![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Jul 2012 Location: Toronto Status: Offline Points: 100 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I requested for the physical file on CD...
|
|
St. Clair
Applied: Aug 2011 Started: March 2012 Test/Interview/RQ: July 2012 RQ submitted: Aug/Sep 2012 File xfered to Scarborough for Oath: 11 Aug 2014 Oath: 25 Nov 2014 |
|
![]() |
|
TD123 ![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Jul 2012 Location: Toronto Status: Offline Points: 100 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks Green... but is it recommended that I should call up CIC (call centre) and inform them about this? I still managed over 1095 days even with the incorrect landing date.
Further advice on this topic by other members will be highly appreciated!!
Edited by TD123 - 22 May 2014 at 2:10pm |
|
St. Clair
Applied: Aug 2011 Started: March 2012 Test/Interview/RQ: July 2012 RQ submitted: Aug/Sep 2012 File xfered to Scarborough for Oath: 11 Aug 2014 Oath: 25 Nov 2014 |
|
![]() |
|
greeen ![]() Average Member ![]() Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Status: Offline Points: 159 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
TD123,
I believe at this stage it will be either/or decision. For me when I obtained a new document that further strengthen my case,the views that I received are toward taking this document to the CJ hearing when I have one instead of sending it now because it might cause additional delay to my case. However, based on the details of the document and its important relevance to my case I may go ahead and submit it. It's your call and the risk you are ready to take,there is no solid answer. |
|
![]() |
|
canuck25 ![]() Moderator Group ![]() Forum Moderator Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Status: Offline Points: 831 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
To my knowledge, there has not been any evidence to support a claim that ordering reports through ATIP results in any kind of action from CIC that otherwise would not have taken place. Case Officers don't deal with ATIP requests and review cases in the order assigned and/or in the order of priority. Can you share the source of your information or observation? Thanks. Edited by canuck25 - 27 May 2014 at 1:35pm |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |