Canada Immigration and Visa Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Canada Immigration Topics > Canadian Citizenship
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Implementation of a New Mandatory Check in GCMS
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Implementation of a New Mandatory Check in GCMS

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
aburami View Drop Down
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 30 May 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 10
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aburami Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Implementation of a New Mandatory Check in GCMS
    Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 10:43pm

Operational Bulletin 263 –
February 8, 2011

Implementation of a New Mandatory Check in GCMS

Summary

Implementation of a mandatory check in the Global Case Management System (GCMS) database for citizenship applicants, effective immediately.

Issue

The purpose of this Operational Bulletin (OB) is to notify citizenship staff of a new mandatory check in GCMS and to provide instructions as to when during the application process this check is to occur. This OB forms part of the Citizenship Fraud Action Plan.

Background

As part of ongoing efforts to maintain program integrity, a mandatory Field Operations Support System (FOSS) check prior to referring citizenship grant applications to a judge for decision was implemented as of April 1, 2010. CP 6 Prohibitions was updated to include this new procedure.

As of November 10, 2010, approximately 4,000 GCMS and FOSS notes (Non-Computer Based Entry (NCB) 27 — Residency Obligation) have been entered for clients linked to a large scale fraud investigation or to a suspicious address. This exercise has reinforced the need for the entire GCMS record, including client and case notes, to be reviewed as part of a citizenship officer’s analysis of the application.

GCMS as a tool in communicating adverse client information

With the deployment of GCMS to a growing number of offices in Canada and abroad, client and case notes will become the most effective method of communicating adverse client information across all lines of business. As per the GCMS User Guide, notes are freeflow text (explanations, rationales, observations, or comments) entered by users to record information which is not captured within specific fields elsewhere in GCMS.

Much like the NCBs in FOSS, notes entered in GCMS will serve as a point of reference for others who may encounter the client. As more offices move towards processing immigration applications through GCMS, information relevant to the processing of citizenship applications will be found throughout GCMS as well as FOSS.

Procedures

To further enhance our program integrity, a manual check of the GCMS record will become mandatory for all regions effective February 1, 2011. This check is to be performed when scheduling clients for a test and/or a hearing, when referring the file to a judge for decision, or when scheduling a client for a ceremony.

Currently, there may be some instances where the citizenship officer consults the electronic file for the first time after the judge has approved the application and the officer is ready to grant citizenship. A mandatory check of GCMS at the time of event scheduling and prior to sending the file to a judge for decision will ensure that applicants meet the requirements for citizenship and that citizenship judges are provided the most complete up-to-date information available to CIC in order to make their decision.

Since adverse information (whether it be concerning residence, criminality, or a client’s permanent residence status) may be uncovered at any point throughout the citizenship application process, it is imperative that citizenship staff review the entire GCMS record any time work is done on a file. This electronic record forms an integral part of the client’s file.

The notes in both GCMS and FOSS are meant to identify to officers that these are cases of concern. Where there is adverse information regarding addresses, officers must follow the directions in the instructions which were circulated on December 4, 2010, describing the role they play in investigating suspicious addresses. Where there is information regarding residence concerns, officers must treat the case as per Appendix A of CP 5. Where there is information regarding criminality or permanent residence status, officers must follow existing procedures as outlined in CP 5.


http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/bulletins/2011/ob263.asp

Back to Top
dpenabill View Drop Down
Top Member
Top Member


Joined: 29 Nov 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 6407
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dpenabill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Feb 2011 at 1:21am
This is indeed an interesting bulletin, and information worth taking note of. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.

The core of this (repeated system checks as an application is processed) was expected even if not previously "mandated," and so is not news in that sense, but it does help to emphasize some things worth recognizing by applicants.

-- Foremost, this is not a one-time check. See the next to last paragraph:
Quote it is imperative that citizenship staff review the entire GCMS record any time work is done on a file.

While the bulletin describes certain specific times the GSMS check should be done, multiple times in the course of the application process (prior to scheduling the test, prior to submitting to the judge, prior to scheduling for oath, and so on), this impresses upon CIC personnel the imperative to check GCMS every time they do some work on a file.

Why this bulletin has been issued looms very, very large:
Quote As of November 10, 2010, approximately 4,000 GCMS and FOSS notes ... have been entered for clients linked to a large scale fraud investigation or to a suspicious address.


It is my impression that this is relative to (or derivative of) just one investigation, the unraveling of a network of fraud exposed when it was recognized that a single Mississauga address was being used as the residential address by, at first blush, many applicants, which was eventually discovered to be hundreds of applicants. The bulletin suggests that this one investigation is now linked to 4000 client notes in the system, suggesting that the extent of fraud being perpetrated is perhaps far greater than previously imagined. No wonder citizenship application processing times have dramatically slowed in the last several months.

Sidenote: A summary, synopsis, or paraphrase with a link, or as you have provided, at least the url address, is preferred to quoting the entirety of publications (not critical for CIC pages, as there is no copyright issue, but the better practice is still to not quote the entirey of external sources).

Bureaucracy is what bureaucracy does, or When in doubt, follow the instructions. Otherwise, follow the instructions.



BTW: Not an expert, not a Can. lawyer, never worked in immigration
Back to Top
amer.j View Drop Down
Average Member
Average Member


Joined: 04 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 159
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote amer.j Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Mar 2011 at 9:37pm
Hi There,

Could I ask what GCMS is stand for? I mean what information is included in the GCMS? Could we personally order it?

Thank you 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down